Asked by
KTVZ
I would vote yes only if it was behind razor wire, vicious dogs and armed guards!
Reply
Piping the canals to conserve water is the logical next step. Where does Commissioner Adair think the wildlife got a drink before the canals were made over 100 years ago? I will admit reducing Junipers and reinvigorating our wild grasslands makes sense.
Reply
The canals were not put in as "water features" for people's backyards. Build your own water feature and pay for the water. This water is meant for agriculture.
Reply
Commission Adair, where do you think wildlife get water when irrigation water is off Oct-March? Please share your plan and funding strategy for removing 5 million juniper trees. What will happen to the wildlife that live in those trees. Your argument is weak.
Reply
Wildlife has relied on these open canals for decades. There is no other option for critter water.
Reply
Better to have them in a supervised setting than simply putting them back on the streets.
Replymaybe...they definitely need to be supervised...however, I definitely don't want my taxes to go to support them
Reply