Central Oregon's News Leader - KTVZ NewsChannel 21, Bend, Oregon
Do you think $3-5 is a fair price for wilderness access fees?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
559 Votes

Do you think $3-5 is a fair price for wilderness access fees?

Yes

7

No

12

Yes

7 Comments
M Davis
1
M Davis

Pay to play. Our forests are being loved to death and we need a plan, oversight and enforcement if the forest is going to continue to be enjoyed by everyone.

Reply
John Driscoll
0
John Driscoll

Nothing is free. If anything, the fee is too low.

Reply
Ben Wiborg
0
Ben Wiborg

As long as it’s used to maintain trails and others wilderness areas as needed.

Reply
Mou Chat Reed
0
Mou Chat Reed

And double for out of state folk.

Reply
Stephanie Finch
0
Stephanie Finch

It’s awful to see the deterioration of these areas due to overuse and irresponsible people- maybe a fee would deter some of the lazier ones? Would absolutely support a local discount though too...

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

I would have said no, if people weren't leaving all their trash in the woods. I'm getting tired of cleaning up after others! Now they can pay a fee to use what should be free.

Reply
Roger Mathus
0
Roger Mathus

Fees are needed and should be used for trail maintenance and for education on protection of the wilderness areas. How people trash out the wilderness areas and make new paths is irresponsible.

Reply

No

12 Comments
kel arn
0
kel arn

We all own this land,government fleecing of america. No more taxes to enjoy land. Remove all fee sites.

Reply
Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

Just another tax that will do nothing Forest Service is just another Government Entity that is full of Fraud Waste and Abuse

Reply
Judy Ostrom-Dixon
0
Judy Ostrom-Dixon

We already pay taxes for this....stop already!!!

Reply
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

Our taxes pay for et al in the forest costs......always has. Just has to do with waste and mismanagement by the USFS and their addiction for more.....more......more...! Haven't paid and never will!

Reply
Karen M Newcomb
0
Karen M Newcomb

I voted no because the public owns the land. I remember a time when I wanted to show my children a special public site, and the fee was too high. I probably won't make use of the trails.

Reply
Patricia Brady-McKinney
0
Patricia Brady-McKinney

We own this land and should not have to pay a fee to use it. How about we quit promoting this place (Visit Bend) so that fewer people come and abuse the land.

Reply
Lucin McGarry
0
Lucin McGarry

Absolutely not, people wonder why very little are spending time outdoors anymore. This is why! Almost every outdoor activity or place to enjoy nature has a price tag on it. What happened to Gods gift?

Reply
Raymond Meskill
0
Raymond Meskill

It belongs to the people

Reply
NotENuf Tea
0
NotENuf Tea

access to public lands should not be charged for. permitted if necessary but no charge to access or go in and camp in undeveloped sites.

Reply
Brad Cheney
0
Brad Cheney

They dont use the money they already get wisely,paying a fee wont make people clean up after themselves and we all know the forest service wont be out there cleaning up peoples left behinds.

Reply
Paul Gauthier
0
Paul Gauthier

These fees will make it very difficult for groups, such as meetups and hiking groups, to make reservations for group hikes in advance. They cannot collect the fees until the day of the hike.

Reply
Heidi Owen
0
Heidi Owen

We should not have to pay for our own land use. It's getting out of hand.

Reply
Do you think higher  SDC fees will lead to fewer new homes in Bend?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
212 Votes

Do you think higher SDC fees will lead to fewer new homes in Bend?

Yes

2

No

0

Yes

2 Comments
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

Beginning to look like the city wants to be a mini Portland. Not what Central Oregon is all about.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

People are already dealing with bidenomics, vote this woke city council out

Reply

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Do you agree with piping of canals in Central Oregon?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
318 Votes

Do you agree with piping of canals in Central Oregon?

Yes

4

No

3

Yes

4 Comments
Michael Thille
1
Michael Thille

Piping the canals to conserve water is the logical next step. Where does Commissioner Adair think the wildlife got a drink before the canals were made over 100 years ago? I will admit reducing Junipers and reinvigorating our wild grasslands makes sense.

Reply
Delaney Gates
1
Delaney Gates

The canals were not put in as "water features" for people's backyards. Build your own water feature and pay for the water. This water is meant for agriculture.

Reply
SunnySunshinestein
1
SunnySunshinestein

Get it done, it's way past time.

Reply
happy jean
0
happy jean

Commission Adair, where do you think wildlife get water when irrigation water is off Oct-March? Please share your plan and funding strategy for removing 5 million juniper trees. What will happen to the wildlife that live in those trees. Your argument is weak.

Reply

No

3 Comments
snowzone
1
snowzone

Why do Bend residence have to accommodate Jefferson county. I'm sure someone up there can figure a way go pump the water they need out of Lake Billy Chinook

Reply
Alma and Bruce Miller
1
Alma and Bruce Miller

I agree with commissioner Patti Adair - there are other alternatives.

Reply
Robert 'Lew' Lewandowski
1
Robert 'Lew' Lewandowski

Wildlife has relied on these open canals for decades. There is no other option for critter water.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT