Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
1/15/2015

Who deserves enshrinement into the College Football HOF more?

43%
Trev Alberts

3

57%
Eric Crouch WINNER

5

43%
Trev Alberts

3 Comments
Ron Huffman
0
Ron Huffman

At first I felt Eric had a whiner attitude. .but I realized that he felt he was the strongest man to lead the team. ...Either way both deserve recognition. .

Reply
Bob Dickson
0
Bob Dickson

Personally; I don't like either of them but Eric is a quitter. Don't care that he won the heisman. He ran home to mommy because Bobby Newcombe got the start and he also wasn't tough enough to cut it in the NFL

Reply
Nathan Turner
0
Nathan Turner

Snyder is very overrated...played 5 creampuffs before losing every year to Oklahoma and Nebraska. Crouch is also just as deserving as Alberts in my opinion on how he changed the QB position along with Vick during that time.

Reply

57%
Eric Crouch

5 Comments
Alan Blackburn
2
Alan Blackburn

Outstanding hands-on contributor to NU victories, more so than TA. TA screwed the UNO athletic program by dropping the DII championship wrestling program. No respect for TA.

Reply
Keith Petrie
0
Keith Petrie

You're kidding right? Trev was good But he wasn't Eric Crouch! Heisman... That says it all!

Reply
Visitor
0
Visitor

Better athlete/leader, difference maker.

Reply
Does B1G+ eliminating the Monthly School Pass change how you will watch games?

Does B1G+ eliminating the Monthly School Pass change how you will watch games?

Yes!

0

No!

0

Yes!

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No!

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Were you surprised by the timeline shift of the Memorial Stadium renovation?

Were you surprised by the timeline shift of the Memorial Stadium renovation?

Yes

5

No

7

Yes

5 Comments
Todd Kalberg
0
Todd Kalberg

I gave up our 4 season ticket a few years ago because of the deficiencies in the South Stadium and then they announced the renovations. Guess I made the right call afterall.

Reply
Joe Nigro
0
Joe Nigro

Once again, the south stadium gets short changed.

Reply
The ANTI Trump
0
The ANTI Trump

Thought it was a done deal.

Reply
Loren Zimmerman
0
Loren Zimmerman

Far too expensive. Special seating for the rich is not fair to the majority of season ticket holders.

Reply
Fred
0
Fred

who wants to pay for tickets and sit in the south endzone? Not me! ill just watch on tv. And lets be honest the sellout streak will end if we dont start winning.

Reply

No

7 Comments
Ralph J. Williams
0
Ralph J. Williams

People had time to think over what was bothering them about the former plans.

Reply
Von Townsend
0
Von Townsend

I don't think the half billion price tag to renovate a 100 year old stadium makes fiscal sense right now. There are also more economical ways to improve south stadium without completely tearing it down and displacing 22K fans for 2 years.

Reply
Visitor
0
Visitor

They were arbitrary plans. No legitimate schematic or even a mockup. Hard to back "we can't describe it, just trust us."

Reply
Steve Farrell
0
Steve Farrell

different leadership - different ideas

Reply
Kent Haynes
0
Kent Haynes

Good to slow down and have another set of eyes relook at everything.

Reply
John Connor
0
John Connor

I think it is good to slow down the project and wait until we starting wiinning as then demand will significantly increase. Also wait until the economy is doing better and interest costs decrease. To me it is being good financial stewards of the Atheltic Department finances. Phases are good.

Reply
Steven Benscoter
0
Steven Benscoter

because I thought that this may not be a good time to be spending that much, when we haven't even finished the last project. I think our AD will have to be able to read the money people, and the times. I thought that Trev A couldn't live with that.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT